Skip to main content

The Failure of Religion, Politics, and Culture

So they took Jesus ... [and] they crucified him ... Pilate also wrote an inscription and put it on the cross. It read, “Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews” ... written in Aramaic, in Latin, and in Greek.
(John 19:16-20 ESV)

I am thoroughly enjoying reading Tim Keller's King's Cross.  In his chapter called The Turn, this sentence caught my attention, "In condemning Jesus, the world was condemning itself" (102).  This got me thinking.

When Jesus was crucified, the inscription posted above Jesus head was meant to be ironic.  We don't know why Pilate posted it - was it Pilate's way of trying to completely humiliate Jesus?  Was it Pilate's tribute to Jesus, a man he knew was innocent but thought was insane?  Was it a passive-aggressive dig at the Jewish leadership for cornering him into crucifying Jesus out of self-preservation - an act he otherwise didn't want to do?  Who knows.

While we can't say why Pilate hung that sign, we can say that his action had meaning far beyond anything he anticipated.  When he posted that inscription above Jesus, he did it in the three languages that dominated his world: Aramaic, the language of the Jewish religion; Greek, the language of the culture makers; and Latin, the language of the Roman political state.

The self-discipline and morality of religion, the advancement and achievement of human culture, and the power and influence of political power - three forces designed to advance human good and save us from ourselves - came together in unity to reject the claim of kingship from this lowly carpenter.  The inscription stood above the condemned and crucified king as a declaration of rejected authority.

And, as Keller states, "In condemning Jesus, the world was condemning itself."

Humanity's best efforts to improve, mature, and protect itself are contained these three fields: religion, culture, and politics.  And yet, all three have failed to save humanity from itself.  We are as big of a mess as we have ever been.

But Jesus, in being rejected by all three, actually won us an acceptance with God that we were unable to gain for ourselves through our best efforts.  As a perfect man, he wasn't just rejected by humans - he stepped into humanity's rejection of God and the judgment we then deserved from God.  He stood in our place as our substitute and bore God's rejection for us.

When Jesus rose from the dead, he didn't just rise in his own victory.  He rose in victory for all who would trust in him as their substitute.  Beyond that, he didn't just rise to take those who would trust him to heaven and away from this earth.  He rose to bring heaven back to earth - to re-establish his glory in the created order.

When this risen King brings his restoration project to completion, his glory will once again be evident in all human endeavors.  And that means that there's hope - even for religion, culture, and politics.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Teaching the Story Arc of the Bible

Each of the Journey campuses has started teaching a gospel class - a class that answers basic questions about following Christ and being a member in our church. This class has attracted a large number of people who are "peaking over the fence" - checking this whole Christianity thing out. That is both exciting and challenging. It gives us the chance to share the Bible with people who don't necessarily come to it with faith - as well as challenge those who do trust the Bible to get on mission with us. Our first lesson was on the story arc of the Bible - what is referred to as the diachronic view of scripture. Simply put, it is a way of looking at scripture as a complete story - with one major primary theme: God in Jesus reconciling the world to himself. Teaching a diachronic view of scripture to postmodern culture, though, presents some unique challenges. In prepping to teach, I wrote out the following thoughts. I would be glad to get any thoughts you have on this to...

Sanctified Diversity: Learning how to Keep in Step with the Gospel

Last Sunday (March 26, 2017), I preached a message at Trailhead Church in Edwardsville, IL , called Sanctified Diversity, looking at Paul's rebuke of Peter for not "keeping in step with the truth of the gospel." The clear implication of this passage is that it's not enough to only know the truth as a follower of Jesus. You must also lean in and learn to live out its implications in the difficult spaces of life.  There are few areas that our culture needs us to lean in with gospel grace, humility, and empathy more than in the area of racial and cultural diversity. It's just not optional. We can be orthodox in our words and heretics with our lives, undermining the integrity of the message of the gospel because we are not walking in its power. To be true to the gospel, we need to do more than just believe its truths. We need to walk out their applications in our lives.  My sermon was called Sanctified Diversity . You can follow that link to listen to it on Tr...

We are Losing by Trying to Win

Most people have heard of Jonathan Swift's classic novel, Gulliver's Travels. In it, Gulliver travels from one strange place to another, encountering tiny people, giant people, talking horses, and all kinds of adventures. Most people today think of it as a children's storybook because the scene where he is tied down on a beach by little people who feel threatened by him has made its way into almost every children's cartoon. But Gulliver's Travels is far from a children's storybook. It is an insightful and often cutting look at human nature. Swift was a careful observer of human behavior and lampooned it mercilessly. Swift was an Irish writer and clergyman and said that he wrote this novel to "vex the world, not divert it." I think we could use some of that vexing - and could do with some learning from it. In Gulliver's last adventure, he runs across creatures called "Yahoos." They are nasty creatures who horde shiny rocks and hur...