Skip to main content

The Failure of Religion, Politics, and Culture

So they took Jesus ... [and] they crucified him ... Pilate also wrote an inscription and put it on the cross. It read, “Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews” ... written in Aramaic, in Latin, and in Greek.
(John 19:16-20 ESV)

I am thoroughly enjoying reading Tim Keller's King's Cross.  In his chapter called The Turn, this sentence caught my attention, "In condemning Jesus, the world was condemning itself" (102).  This got me thinking.

When Jesus was crucified, the inscription posted above Jesus head was meant to be ironic.  We don't know why Pilate posted it - was it Pilate's way of trying to completely humiliate Jesus?  Was it Pilate's tribute to Jesus, a man he knew was innocent but thought was insane?  Was it a passive-aggressive dig at the Jewish leadership for cornering him into crucifying Jesus out of self-preservation - an act he otherwise didn't want to do?  Who knows.

While we can't say why Pilate hung that sign, we can say that his action had meaning far beyond anything he anticipated.  When he posted that inscription above Jesus, he did it in the three languages that dominated his world: Aramaic, the language of the Jewish religion; Greek, the language of the culture makers; and Latin, the language of the Roman political state.

The self-discipline and morality of religion, the advancement and achievement of human culture, and the power and influence of political power - three forces designed to advance human good and save us from ourselves - came together in unity to reject the claim of kingship from this lowly carpenter.  The inscription stood above the condemned and crucified king as a declaration of rejected authority.

And, as Keller states, "In condemning Jesus, the world was condemning itself."

Humanity's best efforts to improve, mature, and protect itself are contained these three fields: religion, culture, and politics.  And yet, all three have failed to save humanity from itself.  We are as big of a mess as we have ever been.

But Jesus, in being rejected by all three, actually won us an acceptance with God that we were unable to gain for ourselves through our best efforts.  As a perfect man, he wasn't just rejected by humans - he stepped into humanity's rejection of God and the judgment we then deserved from God.  He stood in our place as our substitute and bore God's rejection for us.

When Jesus rose from the dead, he didn't just rise in his own victory.  He rose in victory for all who would trust in him as their substitute.  Beyond that, he didn't just rise to take those who would trust him to heaven and away from this earth.  He rose to bring heaven back to earth - to re-establish his glory in the created order.

When this risen King brings his restoration project to completion, his glory will once again be evident in all human endeavors.  And that means that there's hope - even for religion, culture, and politics.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel, Faith, and Asking Jesus into Your Heart

Kelly, our wonderful  Trailhead Kids leader, sent me a link to a great blog over at Sojourn Church.  It is titled " 9 Reasons not to Ask Jesus into your Heart ."  You should read it because it is clear, succinct, and right. I am not a fan of asking Jesus into your heart.  I am not a fan of committing your life to Christ or making him Lord of your life or asking Jesus to be your friend, either.  Strange thing for a pastor to say, right?  Wrong. After I became a believer and started working in a Christian high school, I came to see just how short those kinds of sayings fall from leading people to the real gospel.  As a new believer (and a lover of all things English), I loved my job, most of the things about my school, and, of course, my students.  One of the key frustrations I had, though, was that so many of my students claimed to follow Jesus but so few of them seemed to know him or love him. So, about two months into the school year, I de...

Teaching the Story Arc of the Bible

Each of the Journey campuses has started teaching a gospel class - a class that answers basic questions about following Christ and being a member in our church. This class has attracted a large number of people who are "peaking over the fence" - checking this whole Christianity thing out. That is both exciting and challenging. It gives us the chance to share the Bible with people who don't necessarily come to it with faith - as well as challenge those who do trust the Bible to get on mission with us. Our first lesson was on the story arc of the Bible - what is referred to as the diachronic view of scripture. Simply put, it is a way of looking at scripture as a complete story - with one major primary theme: God in Jesus reconciling the world to himself. Teaching a diachronic view of scripture to postmodern culture, though, presents some unique challenges. In prepping to teach, I wrote out the following thoughts. I would be glad to get any thoughts you have on this to...

Masturbation, Onanism, and Injustice

    The Real Sin of Onan I was a teenage new believer the first time I heard someone talk about the “sin of Onan.” The message was clear—and honestly, kind of terrifying: don’t masturbate. God killed a guy for it once. That story, told in Genesis 38, got repeated in various youth group talks and church settings. Onan became shorthand for what not to do with your body when you’re alone. His name was a warning: “Don’t be like Onan.” Touch yourself like that and God might just touch you to kill you. But when I actually read the passage, I found that it doesn’t say what I was told it says. An Old Reading That Misses the Point It’s true that for centuries—especially in medieval Roman Catholic tradition—this passage was interpreted as a condemnation of any “spilling of seed.” The act of ejaculation outside the context of procreation, whether through withdrawal or masturbation, was viewed as inherently sinful. That interpretation shaped a lot of what was passed down in purity cu...